Friday, August 18, 2006

The Register vs. TATP

The Register has an interesting article that voices its skepticism that TATP was going to be used to blow up airplanes during their transatlantic flight.

Money quote:
Better killing through chemistry

Making a quantity of TATP sufficient to bring down an airplane is not quite as simple as ducking into the toilet and mixing two harmless liquids together.

First, you've got to get adequately concentrated hydrogen peroxide. This is hard to come by, so a large quantity of the three per cent solution sold in pharmacies might have to be concentrated by boiling off the water. Only this is risky, and can lead to mission failure by means of burning down your makeshift lab before a single infidel has been harmed.

But let's assume that you can obtain it in the required concentration, or cook it from a dilute solution without ruining your operation. Fine. The remaining ingredients, acetone and sulfuric acid, are far easier to obtain, and we can assume that you've got them on hand.

Now for the fun part. Take your hydrogen peroxide, acetone, and sulfuric acid, measure them very carefully, and put them into drinks bottles for convenient smuggling onto a plane. It's all right to mix the peroxide and acetone in one container, so long as it remains cool. Don't forget to bring several frozen gel-packs (preferably in a Styrofoam chiller deceptively marked "perishable foods"), a thermometer, a large beaker, a stirring rod, and a medicine dropper. You're going to need them.

It's best to fly first class and order Champagne. The bucket full of ice water, which the airline ought to supply, might possibly be adequate - especially if you have those cold gel-packs handy to supplement the ice, and the Styrofoam chiller handy for insulation - to get you through the cookery without starting a fire in the lavvie.

Easy does it

Once the plane is over the ocean, very discreetly bring all of your gear into the toilet. You might need to make several trips to avoid drawing attention. Once your kit is in place, put a beaker containing the peroxide / acetone mixture into the ice water bath (Champagne bucket), and start adding the acid, drop by drop, while stirring constantly. Watch the reaction temperature carefully. The mixture will heat, and if it gets too hot, you'll end up with a weak explosive. In fact, if it gets really hot, you'll get a premature explosion possibly sufficient to kill you, but probably no one else.

After a few hours - assuming, by some miracle, that the fumes haven't overcome you or alerted passengers or the flight crew to your activities - you'll have a quantity of TATP with which to carry out your mission. Now all you need to do is dry it for an hour or two.

The genius of this scheme is that TATP is relatively easy to detonate. But you must make enough of it to crash the plane, and you must make it with care to assure potency. One needs quality stuff to commit "mass murder on an unimaginable scale," as Deputy Police Commissioner Paul Stephenson put it. While it's true that a slapdash concoction will explode, it's unlikely to do more than blow out a few windows. At best, an infidel or two might be killed by the blast, and one or two others by flying debris as the cabin suddenly depressurizes, but that's about all you're likely to manage under the most favorable conditions possible.

They make it sound that it's darn well impossible to pull off, making remarks about the equipment necessary to bring on the plane, the time it takes, etc. Well, none of those items are banned on carry-ons. Thermometers? Nope. Beaker or other container? Nope. Stirring rod? Nope. Ice-packs? Nope. As for time? For a transatlantic flight, you have plenty of time. The Register's 'critical analysis' seems to be falling apart at the seams, doesn't it?

And indeed, the more it falls apart, the more hyperbolic the article becomes:
We've given extraordinary credit to a collection of jihadist wannabes with an exceptionally poor grasp of the mechanics of attacking a plane, whose only hope of success would have been a pure accident. They would have had to succeed in spite of their own ignorance and incompetence, and in spite of being under police surveillance for a year.

We get this drivel from people that forgot that the last time something like this happened, 19 jihadists brought down 3 planes and the World Trade Center with knives and boxcutters. Pathetic.

Thursday, August 17, 2006

Lieberman leads Lamont by 12 points

Heh.

Wednesday, August 16, 2006

A big mistake

Retreating from Lebanon now is a big mistake with Hezbollah still active.

Monday, August 14, 2006

Death cult?

Sick, if true.

Sunday, August 13, 2006

Lieberman vs. Lamont II

Looks like Joe Lieberman is leading Ned Lamont in the general election for the Connecticut Senate race.

If Joe wins, it'll be a huge victory for the Republican party, and people like Andrew Sullivan can just shove it.

Where are the liberals now?

Ace of Spades delivers a withering attack against liberals who lambasted the Bush administration on the very techniques that disrupted planned airline bombings by Islamists

Concerned Muslim critical to airline bombing arrests

I'm always happy to hear news that moderate Muslims are stepping up to keep Islamists from hijacking their religion.

It took great courage for that person to do what he/she did.